Now you've done it HH, you've mentioned Vassula (TM)! Expect the flying monkeys to arrive any moment...
About pope: According to st. Malachy (see Lignum vitae) before Petrus Romanus there are two Gloria olivae and In persecutione. But if you do not know, that the last pope will be Antichrist, you do not know the Holy Bible. If you read notebooks by Maria Valtorta instead false prophets of this time, you know the thruth. You understand then two times of Antichrist before and after the Warning according to the books of Daniel and Revelations.
So to be concrete: The end times are divided in four periods: 1. Time of forerunners of Antichrist 2. First time of Antichrist (cf. Daniel 8) accompanied by natural disasters 3. Eucharistic kingdom (beginns from the Warning) - milenial kingdom, founded before 2000 years on the cross and completed by Triumph of Catholic Church, period lasting by behavior of mankind (few months or years) 4. Second time of Antichrist where will be abolished daily Sacrifice (cf. Daniel 12) = time will be no more (cf Rev.)=end of times After end of times... 3,5 years of tribulation completed by Chatistment. All people have seen God's Will during the Warning, all people have seen Virgin Mary during the Miracles in Garabandal and Medjugorje, and they followed AGAIN the doctrine of Antichrist, they loved him AGAIN, how they had loved him in his First time. Therefore, the Chatistment must be Great, because it was the Sin against Holy Spirit poured out during the Warning. Read Gospel: When has Jesus Christ his triumph on the earth? BEFORE the crucifixion (Palm Sunday). How long it took? FIVE days, and all Jerusalem has heard the Voice of God in Wednesday (anticipation of Warning). Therefore I believe, that if I say, the Eucharistic Kingdom will take more then five years, I am wrong. If It had lasted at least five months... And then follows the crucifixion of the United Catholic Church, which will be in the tomb no 3 days but more than 3 years. Then follows her Ressurection and the Second Coming.
Julia, I thought I remembered Charlie commenting on MOG at his own blog. Here is a quote from TNRS from July 9: On another note, a few people have complained to me that Padraig Caughey, my friend from Ireland who runs the Mother of God Forum, which I link to at the right, has gone into some anti-Pope attacks, calling Pope Francis a heretic and even linking to things that call the Pope the False Prophet. My correspondents have quite reasonably suggested that I ought to pull the link, since I have enforced a ban on all such talk here on the website. I have given it some thought…and have decided to leave the link up. I like Padraig. I think he is a decent man who seriously contemplates his faith. I also think he is a passionate man, with rivers of emotion sometimes running through him with torrential force. I have nothing but contempt for those pseudo-intellectuals and pseudo-pious scolds who think that they will somehow become heroes if they could just harpoon the Pope – and so seek to find anything or distort anything he says to make him out to be an heretic. That is vanity, pure and simple, and they will be held to account. I don’t think it is any sort of vanity that animates Padraig, but genuine wounded anguish. Some former associates of Padraig’s have disassociated themselves from his site because of this. It is just and proper that they have done so. If this is Padraig’s final answer rather than a primal cry of candid anguish, I will join them soon enough. But I think it is, indeed, a misconceived cry of deep anguish, kind of like when Job constantly complained about God. Unless my estimation of Padraig’s character and the depth of his faith is badly mistaken, I believe that he will soon come to see that attacking the Pope as heretic and such is not just to attack the Pope, but to attack Christ as having lied when He promised that Peter’s faith would not fail. So I am just going to wait a bit. I think the angels of Padraig’s better nature will win out soon – and he is my friend. On more than a few occasions, I have been shown or told something I don’t like at all – and have told the Lord that that is not how I would do it. On every occasion, He has grinned at me and simply said, “I know.” Soon enough, I think and pray that Padraig will candidly tell the Lord he does not understand and is shaken by some things, but will soldier on anyway.
So perhaps Charlie did not remove the link due to concerns about Padraig or about MOG posts complaining about the Pope. An alternate explanation? It's about the now-frozen "Charlie's Perceptive Take" thread that includes quotes showing him to hold those with opposing views in contempt, to use coarse language and make crude and sexually-tinged jokes. Conduct unbecoming to a Sherpa.
I do not understand, why people (Christians) still quarrel about our pope. Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. Revelation 13, 18 is key to Antichrist. If people have not believed false messages about Antichrist, they have prayed for his salvation, because he should be a poor priest according to Maria Valtorta, who have to obey the organization of the beast... So, if somebody still think, that our pope is Antichrist, let they calculate the number of his official name FRANCISCVS (I.) with hebrew numbers: Fe+Resh+Nun+Cade+Iod+Samekh+Kof+Vav+Samekh + (Iod.) If you believe, that warning is imminent, you must know, that it will come when the times will be the worst, what will be the times of Antichrist. If somebody does not accept this, why he waits the warning in the next months or years?
LittleVoice, I don't think all that nonsense about the Pope is true. I only posted to say how MOG forum link had been taken off Charlies list of links. That was all. FRANCISCVS (I.) with hebrew numbers: Fe+Resh+Nun+Cade+Iod+Samekh+Kof+Vav+Samekh + (Iod.) What was all that about.
I am not sure you can jump to that conclusion. I guess the only way to know for sure would be to ask him.
PotatoSack, I doubt he will answer, but it would be interesting to learn. Can you think of another reason? Edited to add: On his blog Charlie responds quickly to any critics. See his posts of April 29, 2016 and May 1, 2016 after the National Catholic Register posted a column on him. https://charliej373.wordpress.com/2016/04/29/charlie-johnston-threat-or-menace/ https://charliej373.wordpress.com/2016/05/01/just-one-more-thing/
Harper, have you any views on the 'Warning,' we know Charlie does not think it will be as the Garabandal visionaries describe it; but he is entitled to his personal view. He does not claim God gave him any information in the way the Garabandal or Medjugorje visionaries claim Heaven has informed them. Wondered what your thoughts are on the Warning.
I do not know anything about Charlie, but from the posts here I have not checked him out because his prophecy is often framed in a negative light. Why have a link to this website when often there are posts contrary to his messages?
Oh, Julia, my only thoughts are that I hope I survive it! I've had a glimpse now and then in prayer when I felt the weight of my offenses against God. I do the Divine Mercy novena every year, and pray that everyone in my family dies in the state of grace.
Sorrowful, Charlie is a member of this forum, and only recently removed the link. Thus the question why? I have speculated since I haven't seen anything else that seems likely. But I could be wrong (and often am). I have serious concerns about him, but certainly not everyone does. At least he is specific in his predictions (although he recently clarified his beliefs regarding the election to shift to something on the order of there won't be a normal transition of power in the US in January).
You could very well be right then. Yet removing the link without saying why is passive aggressive, which is something that doesn't appear to be typical of Charlie's nature. It seems strange that he wouldn't come here and defend the Pope if he takes issue with the posts here.
SH, I did read on Charlies site a while back that readers from MOG Forum had emailed Charlie complaining about the attacks on the Pope on this Forum, even from Padraig. Charlie does not support us lay people criticizing the Pope, especially Padraig who needs to be a good example; and I remember reading Charlie said he would give a while to see if things improved and would remove the MOG link if the tone did not improve. I don't think there would be any point in Charlie or anyone trying to defend the Holy Father, God knows I have tried and others too. It seems those who want to bash the Pope have a blind spot. It gives me the creeps, because that is what mdm did and was found to be a heretic.
Charlie already stated clearly his intentions regarding the link to this forum. He said he was going to leave the link to MOG up for the time being but that if Padraig's attitude towards the Pope turned out to be more than a knee-jerk outburst (I'm paraphrasing) he would reconsider and perhaps remove the link. I think it's safe to say that Padraig has not changed his position with regard to Pope Francis and that Charlie has therefore quietly removed the link to MOG from his website. To read more into it than that would be a stretch. I wouldn't say it's passive aggressive since he already stated that he would remove the link if Padraig didn't change his tune about Pope Francis. The fact that he did it quietly suggests to me that he didn't want to call too much attention to it or appear to be "denouncing" the forum.
