Doctors in most countries wont prescribe these medicines for cancer. They will be raked through the courts even if the patient is cured. Cancer is a 200 billion dollar industry in the US alone. https://www.forbes.com/sites/victor...n-most-countries-but-without-better-outcomes/
Yes that does explain why they will not act. But this woman had been given a terminal cancer diagnosis of short duration. It is sad that doctors would not at least give her a chance when all else had failed. I did consider buying Ivermectin myself and treating her with her own and her husbands consent. But I backed away from it thinking I could open myself to some serious litigation. There must be something rotten with the medical system for this scenario to exist. But I do thank doctors for all the good they do and God too for their talents.
At least you tried. Good for you. I have a liberal, very vaxxed friend whose husband was diagnosed in June with aggressive prostate cancer. At that time he had an MRI which showed 4 lesions and a biopsy. The plan was to remove his prostate but the couple wanted to get a second opinion. I sent them several articles and videos on fenbendazole. Honestly, I had no expectation that they'd give it any consideration. But they did and he began taking a veterinary version of fenbendazole because albendazole, the human alternative, is very expensive. At the beginning of November he had one more pre-op MRI and all lesions were gone. He said the surgeon and physician assistant who have seen them since the last MRI are in disbelief. I then suggested he research ivermectin as several docs are recommending taking both for cancer along with other supplements. If anyone is interested, the fenbendazole protocol my friend is following has become known as the Joe Tippens protocol: https://mycancerstory.rocks/ One of the oncologist/radiologist docs recommending taking both ivermectin and fenbendazole is Dr. Makis in Canada. He publishes dosage guides too. https://x.com/MakisMD https://makismd.substack.com/ From everything I've read, if I had cancer I'd take both along with other supplements. It seems to me that God has brought great good, these alternative cancer treatments, out of the covid evils.
So many stories like this coming out now. It used to be that pancreatic cancer was a quick death sentence, now people taking anti-parisiticals are getting rid of it no problem. There is this thing that happens in nature which starts in the soil. Many kinds of creatures from bacteria/fungi and up create certain kinds of chemicals which plants then uptake and use to protect themselves. There is even a certain chemical that earthworms make which gets rid of insects and other diseases on trees. So when we eat a vegetable or any plant matter, we typically get these things in our systems as well, at least historically. But now with the soil having been depleted of life, we no longer get these essential defense mechanisms, at least not in the quantity we used to. Bayer makes drugs and has an agriculture division. It's a game to them. Create an illness and treat the symptoms.
I'm a veterinarian. It's a long time since my student days when I would have last seen cancer cells under the microscope. I can't affirm that they looked in any way like parasitic egg sacs. Cancer is the corruption of normal cell growth. It is too simplistic to say that the entire medical profession, who have had light microscopes for at least two centuries, have collectively managed to miss something as obvious as this. Nor can we construct conspiracy theories retrospectively. Big Pharma wasn't the greedy, ideological, multinational entity it is now, before WWII at the earliest. That's not to say that certain chemicals that are primarily directed at parasites might not have an effect on cancers-there is too much anecdotal evidence regarding Ivermectin to be ignored. A word of caution: some anthelminthics are very dangerous for foetuses in the first trimester, at least in some animals. This indicates an effect on cell growth, so it's not a huge step to project a possible effect on neoplastic cell division. Consider this: the most common and tragic cancer, nowadays, is breast cancer in young women. I would consider the most likely cause of out-of-control cell division would be from hormones, which are chemicals designed to control and promote such growth, It is most likely that the huge increase in these cancers in the last half-century isn't from parasites, but from the hormone-based contraceptive pill. But, that's swept under the carpet. A recent study has found that dairy products and meat contain chemicals that inhibit cancer. Yet, there is huge evidence-devoid propaganda to convince the gullible masses that these foods are somehow bad for one's health. Instead, many people are vegetarian, even vegan, or replace these things with processed 'food'. Apart from a concommitant dramatic rise in diabetes, it's likely that cancer is much more likely to be caused by such dietary change than parasites, which were always there and long before we had anti-parasiticides. I'm not excusing Big Pharma. Nowadays, with their anti-diabetic and other lifestyle drugs, they are making huge profits. It suits them also to go along with the propaganda of the enormous food corporations that are selling and pushing processed foods. Companies like Coca-cola, Pepsico, Nestle, Kellogs, and Danon, to name but a few. The ill health, often chronic, caused by all these processed and convenient foods, represents a huge market for Big Pharma. I've often said to my farmer clients that we've been getting no new antibiotics for decades, not because they can't be developed, but because the animal drug companies find vaccines more profitable. A cow will require an antibiotic only very rarely. With vaccines, each has to get a shot, repeated every year-more lucrative. I have no evidence for this, just following the money. It is the same in human medicine. I'd like to hear what Brian has to say on all this.
When I was in college for my biology degree, they had a full semester class on the biology of cancer. I wish I would have taken the class.
I totally understand your skepticism, given how many people have looked at this. All I know is that these anti-parasiticals are working to treat cancer for many people around the world and there is a lot of resistance in the medical establishment to this. You would think everyone would be excited about this possibility. I don't know what the mechanism is, however it stands to reason that if anti-parasiticals are getting rid of cancer, that cancer is related to parasites. As well, sometimes humanity does some really really weird things from time to time. Tomatoes used to be thought poisonous. https://smithsonianmag.com/arts-cul...red-in-europe-for-more-than-200-years-863735/
Thanks for the info! My husband is going to the urologist tomorrow to see if he has prostate cancer. If not, they are also sending him to a long covid clinic. Hopefully we will get some answers, he has been declining for two years and all his regular tests say he is ok. So, I printed out the page and will keep it in case we need to get some of these drugs on our own. Thanks. Kathy
If you re-read my post, you will see that I do not disagree that anthelminthics cure cancers to varying degrees. This seems irrefutable in the case of Ivermectin in particular, due to the weight of anecdotal evidence. And all scientifically-proven evidence originally begins as anecdotal. I am not sceptical, nor unexcited, about these almost certain facts. However, it does not logically follow that if anthelminthics cure cancer, then, ergo, parasites cause cancer. There are numerous chemicals that cure disease in nature that are not derived from sources that cause the disease. For example, Penicillin was discovered in a mould that does not cause the infections that it treats. There are countless other examples of God's generosity. And, I can also say that what microscopic samples of cancer that I've seen never struck me as having the appearance of parasitic eggs. I think it does not help the case by asserting so-called facts that could not possibly have been unnoticed by countless people, with no axes to grind, in the course of researching cancer. Let's assert the efficacy of anthelminthics, by all means; let's not blame parasites for the cause of a disease that originates at a much more fundamental level.
I'd recommend having a read of Ann Barnhardt's blog. She knows quite a bit about Ivermectin (she started out as a cattle-dealer!) and even has the dosages worked out for using it as a treatment. I can't professionally recommend its usage, but use your own judgement.
I just spoke to DeGaull privately three months ago and asked him if he had used any of these antiparasitic drugs as a veterinarian on animals with cancer. What I can say is that ivermectin works for corona because it prevents the spread of virus cells and thus gives your body an advantage to create the possibility of resistance. If it prevents viruses, not necessarily ivermectin, then there may be a mechanism by which it also affects tumor cells because no one knows the mechanism by which it works. I had immunology at university, but that is quickly glossed over and 99% of the medical profession has no idea about it unless they specialize. A few weeks ago, an article was quietly published in Croatia about our scientist who works in Zagreb at the most prestigious Ruđer Bošković Institute (a 17th century Jesuit, a top scientist), and numerous medical journals published her achievement. Just a short digression, the woman is a very staunch Catholic and studies the effect of viruses on tumors. Basically, she had a breast tumor, it came back on two occasions so that she could take a virus that she had grown herself in the laboratory and injected it into the tumor, and in this way the viral particles attacked the tumors... Since then, i.e. 2020, the tumor has not returned. The "media" and the "scientific profession" attacked her as unethical because how can a person do something outside the pharmaceutical industry and imagine this, save their own life. According to them, she should have died.... https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03647-0 I will say this, there are a bunch of good scientists and people in science, unfortunately the pharmaceutical and medical industry is in the hands of the same ones who make the world for themselves, with of course a lot of profit. When you look at it, science experienced the greatest progress when we had independent scientists who were independent of various megacorporations and developed on their own terms( 19. and early 20 century ). Today, unfortunately, a lot of this is prevented by regulations, supervision, "safety protocols" and of course registered under "confidential". The corona crisis showed this best when all medical professionals and scientists who spoke differently from the protocol were attacked. Not to mention how, for example, Indian and Japanese immunologists approved ivermectin, in Slovenia and Denmark they banned modern because it causes myocarditis, while in other countries they considered it permissible, etc. I think everyone understands the paradox of how something was violently pushed beyond all ethical and moral scientific postulates, and not only for the sake of profit. We need to be careful about what we eat, as much grain, fruit and vegetables as possible (that it is not GMO and preferably domestic, not treated with pesticides). Vitamin D, turmeric is great and in the end everything is in God's hands. What I can tell you 100% on my own example, when science and man cross you and say it's over, God always finds a way if it's His will. Nothing is impossible for God. Suffering is perhaps the worst part of human destiny, but it is unavoidable. When it comes, give it to Jesus on the cross, because we will know the true value of it only in heaven and, of course, firm trust in God's providence...
There is a lot written about cancer. Cancer research is a huge industry, but despite decades of huge resources being invested in the search for a 'cure', we are no nearer to finding one. We have really only made progress in slowing down the disease. In a lot of cases, there are serious arguments to be made that the 'cure' is worse than the disease, with people clinging on to an extra year or two of great suffering, when they might have got six months of quality life, if refusing the treatment. Catholic moral theology holds that one doesn't have to take on an excessive burden in order to survive; for example, one is not obliged to amputate a limb in order to survive, if one thinks that life without it would be excessively burdensome. In that light, maybe people are being directed towards very expensive treatment in order to profit third parties, rather than being given the proper, realistic, advice. For my own part, I consider cancer as the biological equivalent of what is known in physics as the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The 2nd Law basically states that, if left to itself, the Universe will eventually degenerate into a total state of complete disorder; in other words, death. Cancer is the biological equivalent. It is life degenerating into a state of disorder, which has the same end result, of death. It might not even need a specific cause. If left long enough, all cells will lose their order and become cancerous, I believe. It is, like the 2nd Law, an inevitable result of the Fall. Everything will die. Everything. And this is how it happens to life, if something else hasn't done it in the meantime. Glad I could cheer you up! Of course, don't forgot, all order is due to God. Without Him, there is no order, only death. Every moment we live is entirely due to God's maintaining that Order.
I agree with everything you say. I remember that we had a private conversation, but I don't think I offered much knowledge, nor could I. In truth, animals suffer from cancer a lot less than humans, primarily because they live much shorter lives. Cows occasionally get conjunctival cancer (certain breeds are over-sensitive to sunlight), but one would not attempt to treat (I did once do very successful amputations, but a necessary anaesthetic became unavailable), so one advises the farmer to send the cow for slaughter! Bitches sometimes get mammary tumours and it is far more prevalent in late-neutered bitches, which suggests the influence of hormones, which are chemicals with a very profound effect on cell-division, and cancer is intrinsically out-of-control cellular division. Contraceptive pills, of course, consist of very powerful hormones, used over very long periods.
Start me off on veterinary matters, and I can't stop. I'm quite cynical about Big Pharma. It's all money. After the discovery of Penicillin, there was a long series of discovering and developing of new antibiotics. The range was so broad, it was confusing. Inevitably, there was some development of resistance, that's life, but one could try an alternative or a new one would soon come on the market. Then, it all stopped. New antibiotics became as rare as hens' teeth. Maybe, these enormous industries, with almost limitless resources were defeated by unicellular bacteria; maybe no new avenue of vulnerability could be found in these simple, but still unimaginably complex organisms. Anyway, next thing we veterinarians are being told to restrict our antibiotic usage on animals, despite our responsibility towards those animals that we have husbanded into environments that inevitably leave them prone to many infectious diseases. This is purportedly so that these antibiotics don't lose their effectiveness for humans. Conveniently, animal vaccines for all sorts of things start coming on the market. Much more lucrative for the drug companies, because they require repeated mass dosage. I've generally advised farmers that, if they vaccinate for everything, not only will it blow a very big hole in their profits, it is questionable if any creature's immune system can adequately respond to such high challenge, without either some/all of the vaccines or something else, failing. All I can say, with the provisos that there are other factors and correlation isn't necessarily causation, in present-day Ireland, which has unprecedented levels of cattle vaccination, there are now record levels of the unvaccinated disease of bovine tuberculosis. Nothing to see here, move on. And that's before we say a word about human vaccines and those drugs called vaccines that aren't vaccines at all...
I have learned a great deal reading your posts on this thread. I grew up with the world in awe of vaccines and antibiotics. People got careless about things because there was a pill to cure it. Small pox was eradicated because of the vaccine. I remember getting it on my arm. The world was a much safer place. Until it wasn't. It seems to me it started getting out of control when drug companies started advertising on media everywhere. Big pharma was born. Now it's hard to know who or what to believe. Covid shook my faith in a whole bunch of institutions but especially the medical world who was always the shining light on the hill. But not any more. To me or anyone. So sad. Fr Gobbi told us at a gathering I was privileged to attend in 1982 that Our Lady told him a time was coming when ALL institutions would fail. She repeated "all". Little did we know that included the Rock of the Church. She said "only I can help you. Enter my heart and I will keep you as in an enclosed garden." Everyone should be consecrated to her Immaculate Heart if possible. She is the Ark for these perilous days.
This is a very valuable post. Thanks. A tree is known by its fruit. Things have changed since our childhood. It was a slow, sneaky fall. Suddenly the blinders fell off. Thank God that He shows us the Truth. You are right in saying everyone should be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. And wear blessed sacramentals. And pray the rosary daily.
Hi Kathy, Here's Dr. Makis protocol which you could use along with Ann Barnhardt's to ensure you have the correct dosage. Ann's dosing chart is for the 1% veterinarian solution of ivermectin. I just copied and pasted from Dr. Makis' twitter account. William Makis MD @MakisMD NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN - Articles and Protocols for CANCER, Research studies and access to Ivermectin pills Recently, I have seen tremendous demand for some sort of initial guidance “WHERE TO START” with High Dose Ivermectin for CANCER. So I'm reposting my Ivermectin Cancer Protocol. It's very simple to use. Did you know that Ivermectin is annually taken by close to 250 million people? Ivermectin has a dozen anti-cancer mechanisms but they can be summarized into two main ones: 1. Inhibits cancer proliferation signaling pathways (Akt, mTOR, Wnt) 2. Inhibits Cancer Stem Cells IVERMECTIN will act against regular CANCER as well as Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced TURBO CANCER (which is highly resistant to chemo) Here are recent studies on IVERMECTIN use in certain types of cancer: BLADDER CANCER - (2024 Fan et al) - Ivermectin Inhibits Bladder Cancer Cell Growth and Induces Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage LUNG CANCER - (2024 Man-Yuan Li et al) - Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells GLIOMA - (2024 Xing Hu et al) - Ivermectin as a potential therapeutic strategy for glioma MULTIPLE MYELOMA - (2024 Yang Song et al) - Gene signatures to therapeutics: Assessing the potential of ivermectin against t(4;14) multiple myeloma OVARIAN CANCER - (2023 Jawad et al) - Ivermectin augments the anti-cancer activity of pitavastatin in ovarian cancer cells PROSTATE CANCER - (2022 Lu et al) - Integrated analysis reveals FOXA1 and Ku70/Ku80 as targets of ivermectin in prostate cancer COLON CANCER - (2022, Alghamdi et al) - Efficacy of ivermectin against colon cancer induced by dimethylhydrazine in male wistar rats PANCREATIC CANCER - (2022 Lee et al) - Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via mitochondrial dysfunction MELANOMA - (2022 Zhang et al) - Drug repurposing of ivermectin abrogates neutrophil extracellular traps and prevents melanoma metastasis IVERMECTIN has proven anti-cancer activity against some 20 cancer types, although these are pre-clinical studies. We will never see clinical studies because Ivermectin is off patent and cheap. Merck, which used to have a patent on Ivermectin, has partnered with Moderna on mRNA Cancer Vaccines. IVERMECTIN is so safe, that in much of the civilized world, it is available over the counter, no prescription needed. That’s how it should be. I recently wrote about how a doctor in Saskatchewan, Canada was just given a $44,800 penalty by the College of Physicians and Surgeons for prescribing Ivermectin to a few patients during 2020-2022. The Ontario College of Physicians even had an Investigator go undercover and dress up as a Canadian Trucker to ensnare a young doctor prescribing Ivermectin in Ottawa in 2022 during the Trucker Convoy. Canadians must realize that the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons are private corporations, fully bought off by big pharma and run by mafia lawyers who are putting pressure on doctors to comply or else No healthcare bureaucrat or lawyer has the right to deny anyone access to life saving medication. And if they do, they are committing a very serious crime. It's time for Canadians to bring the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons to Justice for their many COVID-19 crimes, take them over, dissolve them, and start over. I now have a trusted, affordable source for Ivermectin, so if you need access to Ivermectin, please email me. Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the 1st photo at the top, into your browser to access @JoeRogan @TuckerCarlson @ABDanielleSmith #DiedSuddenly Last edited3:59 AM · Jul 2, 2024 · 2.3M Views
Here's Dr. Makis' 1st published paper and comments on ivermectin and fenbendazole for cancer. It's only 2 of the pages. The rest is behind a paywall on his substack. Also, he has many cancer testimonials there. I hope your husband is well soon and DOES NOT have cancer. William Makis MD @MakisMD BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol in Cancer has been peer-reviewed and published on Sep.19, 2024! The future of Cancer Treatment starts NOW. My thanks to lead authors Ilyes Baghli and Pierrick Martinez for their incredible inspired work, FLCCC’s Dr.Paul Marik for his extensive work on repurposed drugs and every co-author who worked hard to bring this paper to life. I hope that this peer-reviewed paper lays the groundwork for a brand new future for Cancer Treatment. Many of you know that I have been helping thousands of Cancer patients with high dose Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole. We are already starting to see incredible successes with these repurposed drugs. Mainstream Oncology collapsed after the rollout of contaminated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Most Oncologists abandoned their Hippocratic Oath, gave contaminated mRNA Vaccines to all their cancer patients and took the mRNA jabs themselves. Some Oncologists have now developed mRNA Induced Cardiac arrests, blood clots and Turbo Cancer. Others have already died suddenly. These Oncologists buried their heads in the sand and abandoned everything that it takes to be a good competent doctor.However, there are doctors who are blazing a new path into the future. See you there! @TuckerCarlson @joerogan Last edited12:39 AM · Oct 13, 2024 · 6.8M Views
Something I find very interesting is that a veterinarian oncology researcher at Oklahoma State University first used fenbendazole with her control and cancer mice testing groups because they had some mite or something (I don't remember). She didn't want to start her experiment all over so she used fenbendazole on both groups and to her surprise all the cancer tumors in the mice disappeared. Two years later she herself was diagnosed with inoperable brain cancer and thought she might as well try it. Her cancer disappeared as well. Joe Tippens heard about fenben from his old college friend from OSU who had become a vet. So in the USA the knowledge of fenbendazole as a human cancer treatment has spread through veterinarians. To me it's like the parable of the prodigal son where he lamented that the pigs were being treated better than he was. (Maybe we've been getting what we deserve)
