I believe the Second Vatican Council was carried out in a manipulative way. The position of the majority of the cardinals was probably genuinely intended for the good of the Church and its priests. I would say it was presented in the spirit of Christ's words: *"I have not come to abolish the Law, but to fulfill it."* The problem, in my view, was that a certain "sect" with malicious intentions infiltrated the process in order to advance its own agenda under that very slogan, while ultimately discarding what had come before and creating a new kind of Church. Although they speak of openness and compromise, they closed themselves off to everyone who pointed out what they believed were errors. Personally, I do not think their original goal was even to take complete control immediately, but rather to build a long-term majority. In the beginning, following the sexual abuse scandals, I believe they also used those events as a form of leverage—something similar to the way the Epstein documents have been described as being used. Through blackmail, they allegedly kept pressure on the Pope and the leadership of the Roman Curia by threatening to release information that would damage the Church's reputation. I also believe that previous good Popes feared the collapse of faith and trust in the Church, and that this period was exploited by those groups to build networks and, I would say, place their own people in key positions. The Church is still God's Church and always will be. However, Christ never said there would never be a painful purification or division. I fear that such times may lie ahead. We should pray for unity, but God is not "modern" in the sense of adapting His truth to the spirit of the age. In my opinion, some people seek to undermine the Church from within; I believe that was their intention from the very beginning, under the guise of concern for the C hurch.
I suspect their intention (and the conspiracy seems to extend right to the very top) is to drive believing Catholics (as opposed to the indifferent who are delighted to hear they can do what they like as long as they’re not ‘racist’ or antisemitic or sceptical about the climate and ‘love the poor’) out of The Church. Our duty is to remain within, no matter how much it sickens our stomachs.
According to Bella Dodd, the Church has been infiltrated by Communists over the years. She testified to this. And then we have the Freemasons. But it's not the end.
Well if we look at the example of Jesus, He knew of course that the High Priest and a good part of the Sanheddrin, kinda like the Pope and the Vatican of His day, were corrupt, rotten and evil to the very core. As well as heretical and unscriptural. But Jesus was obedient to them even to His death and He told His disciples to do the same. If we only had to be obedient to good people , life would be very easy. But being obedient to people who are rotten to the core is very,very hard. Nevertheless we are called to obedience by Jesus Himself, not only by His words but by His example. Matthew 23:2 1Then Jesus spoke to the crowds and to His disciples: 2 “The scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3So practice and observe everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.…
I am not that worried about this with the SSPX in the end it is only a very small thing really. But Prophecy indicates a huge big schism may be on the way. That when it comes will be something to be really concerned about and difficult. This with the SSPX is not, I believe the big Schism of Prophecy.
