Here is a post confirming the Flemish decision to bless abominable unions - https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2022/09/belgian-cardinal-and-bishops-approve.html I have a couple of points to make: 1. I feel sick literally sick to the pit of my stomach for I love Christ's church and these apostates are sourging Christ again 2. We are on the cusp of seismic events 3. The Church is going to spiral out of control with a total lack of discipline - the one who is in charge has much responsibility for this because his tactical take has always been to 'create a mess' - he has succeeded. 4. We are getting closer and closer to 'things will be at their worst' moments- nearing the warning - things will be at their worst in the church and in the world. 5. It is time for Cardinals, Bishops and clergy to stand up to the Pope and say enough is enough 6. The justice of God is coming - we are going to move swiftly from mercy to judgement
garabandal, I believe that you are correct. Looking at item 5 in your list, I believe the problem is that when the pope was presented with the Dubia he ignored for several months and then finally stated that he did not need to address etc. Then I remember the filial correction with so many signatures and that when ignored also. This why I believe that your item 4 is coming soon. In addition, I think that Russia and China will want to make their big moves while Biden is in office. I also think that if there is a red wave in November, Russia and China will realize that their time is short. Its Official. Prep for Total War. 9/19/2022
My pastor always talks about the Blessed Sacrament being the only place where Heaven and Earth unite. This rings true.
They do. I believe Marie Julie Jahenny and Anne Catherine Emmerich both do. I could be wrong but I think they are the ones.
Thanks Blizzard. I think that it is important to note that Jennifer states, "this false prophet" not "the False Prophet". Keep prayimg.+
Terrible, terrible times. But we must never loose our peace. God is in Charge. It is Christ's Bride; He well knows how to take care of His own. Dear Jesus clam this terrible storm!
Before the Final Judgment is now. Desmond is right when he says the Great Apostasy happens before the Final Judgment. That’s what PNF has been trying to explain to you. The Apostasy is unveiling who is who today. We are witnessing Bishop against Bishop, priest against priest. The Warning is Christ coming to us in a mini judgment. It’s his greatest act of mercy since his resurrection. Who knows how long the world will have before the Last Judgment? Between todays Great Apostasy and the Last Judgment it may take a few years, decades or centuries. We don’t know. But the signs of the end times are here already. We are due for a new era soon.
Byron, I’m sorry but I do not agree on that timeline. In Fr Heilman’s interview, Desmond said we are not in the Great Apostasy. He said we have a long way to go before that. I know you do not agree.
That’s what Garabandal is all about. Sister Faustina tells it clearly. And Desmond just explained it. Otherwise if the Great Apostasy was the last coming of Christ, we wouldn’t have the Great Judgment. It’s not that the Catechism is incorrect, it’s that we don’t interpret it clearly. We mix it up, unfortunately, with the Protestants version. But Sister Faustina and Maria Esperanza explained it better.
There is always hope. Even if this era will soon end, God is in charge. I don’t see what’s coming as a disaster. I am fed up with this era already. I’m eager to see it end. Don’t be scared. It will be glorious to see so many convert. Amen Amen.
From the Lamont article: "The sentence 'To be admitted to the feast all that is required is the wedding garment of faith which comes from the hearing of his Word' is a straightforward verbal contradiction of the Council of Trent’s definition, 'If anyone says that faith alone is sufficient preparation for receiving the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist, let him be anathema.' The document does not contain any clarification explaining this sentence in an orthodox sense, or any mention of the necessity of repentance for worthy reception of the Eucharist." Combine the above with Lamont's conclusion: "Since Pope Francis has publicly stated his agreement with the (heretical) views of Martin Luther concerning justification, we ought to interpret his words on the reception of the Eucharist as agreeing with Luther’s position on that subject." Now what happens when any member of the Church obstinately professes something that is a direct contradiction to a canon from the Ecumenical Council of Trent? He is "anathematized," meaning he is "outside of the Church." A person who is "outside of the Church" cannot be "the Pope." For more background on deposing a Pope for heresy, see the following: https://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2017/09/28/can-a-pope-commit-heresy-heresy-defined/ https://www.vatican.va/content/john...i_motu-proprio_30061998_ad-tuendam-fidem.html https://mediatrixpress.com/2014/11/08/st-robert-bellarmine-on-judging-a-pope/
In the document DESIDERIO DESIDERAVI the Pope does refer to other sacraments so in context you could say he refers to confession here -- The Lord Jesus who dies no more, who lives forever with the signs of his Passion [2] continues to pardon us, to heal us, to save us with the power of the sacraments. Also here he talks of confession The beginning of every celebration reminds me who I am, asking me to confess my sin and inviting me to implore the Blessed Mary ever virgin, the angels and saints and all my brothers and sisters to pray for me to the Lord our God. Certainly, we are not worthy to enter his house. So he could argue that the statement about the 'garment of faith' needs to be read in context of the whole document. I am not defending Francis for the sake of it but I don't think this is a clear-cut example of heresy because of the context as mentioned. The whole document is a pipe dream - the man does not live in the real world - he is somewhat detached - amazing that he doesn't seem to know that the pews are empty and he is preaching to thin air on the liturgy of the Novus Ordo -
My, my, I must keep up with the times. According to Pope Francis, The Catholic Church, Lutherans and indeed all Protestants are now in agreement with Martin Luther's views on justification, which apparently were 'not mistaken'. [This is from the Lamont article]. Can anyone here explain when all this came about-unfortunately I seem to have missed it?
Yes, you are correct HeavenlyHosts. Desmond compares the time that we are in now to another time in the Church’s history which he states was far worse and most people were denouncing the Faith. I watched a video of him recently speaking about this. He stated that this is a minor apostasy and the Great apostasy would be worse than that previous time in the Church’s history. I think that we are witnessing the setup for that time, unfortunately but I am hopeful that God intervenes. Edited to add: I also remember Desmond saying that many Catholics currently should be defined as lapsed or even heretics but not apostates. An apostate needs to denounce the Faith. That is how he explained the difference.
