Just saw this from Mark Mallet-for your discernment Messages from Our Lady, Queen of Peace, to Pedro Regis February 18, 2025 Dear children, courage! There is no victory without the cross. The men and women of faith will drink the bitter chalice of suffering. Those who love and defend the truth will carry a heavy cross. A dangerous wolf will come. He will look like a lamb, but he will act with great fury. (1) The Church of My Jesus will tremble. Pray. Pray. Pray. I suffer for what comes to you. Seek strength in the Gospel and in the Eucharist. In the lessons of the past you will find the light for your spiritual journey. Onward without fear! I will pray to My Jesus for you. Remain firm on the path I have pointed out to you over these years and you will achieve victory. I am your Mother and I love you. Open your hearts and you will be able to understand My presence in your midst. This is the message that I transmit to you today in the name of the Most Holy Trinity. Thank you for having allowed Me to reunite you here once more. I bless you, in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen. Remain in peace. Pedro Regis – “A dangerous wolf will come. He will look like a lamb, but he will act with great fury.”
So the Pope is in critical condition.. I hadn't thought much about this Pope dying all of a sudden. Now I'm waiting for the news. Kind of wondering who the next Pope will be if that happens and if this message describes him
There was another message from a visionary where Our Lady says tge exact same thing, that the next Pope will act, 'With fury'. Please God it is not so
Maybe it's just me, but I immediately question any alleged message with this typically telegraphed way of speaking that Our Lady never uses in authentic apparitions/messages.
I don’t know if Pedro Regis is credible. The good folks at the Countdown site assure us that he is. Anyway his latest messages double down on his previous messages. “A great storm will come and the great vessel [the Church] will stray from safe harbor. The smoke of the devil will spread and there will be great spiritual blindness. Days will come when you will seek the truth and in many places they will offer you lies. Seek Jesus and remain faithful to the teachings of the true Magisterium of His Church.” The way the current pope has stacked the deck it will take a miracle for a good pope to be chosen. I’ve always felt that the current pope was just preparing the way for his successor. Hope I’m wrong. https://www.countdowntothekingdom.com/pedro-flee-from-wherever-your-christian-dignity-is-profaned/
February 18, 2025 Dear children, courage! There is no victory without the cross. The men and women of faith will drink the bitter chalice of suffering. Those who love and defend the truth will carry a heavy cross. A dangerous wolf will come. He will look like a lamb, but he will act with great fury. (1) The Church of My Jesus will tremble. Pray. Pray. Pray. I suffer for what comes to you. Seek strength in the Gospel and in the Eucharist. In the lessons of the past you will find the light for your spiritual journey. Onward without fear! I will pray to My Jesus for you. Remain firm on the path I have pointed out to you over these years and you will achieve victory. I am your Mother and I love you. Open your hearts and you will be able to understand My presence in your midst. This is the message that I transmit to you today in the name of the Most Holy Trinity. Thank you for having allowed Me to reunite you here once more. I bless you, in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen. Remain in peace. Here are the main points given in the message: 1. Those who defend the truth should expect great suffering [John 15:18-20]. 2. A false prophet, a wolf in sheep's clothing, will come and bring chaos [Matthew 7:15 and Matthew 24 and Apocalypse 13]. 3. The Church of the true faithful remnant will be in tribulation when this happens [Matthew 24 and the Apocalypse]. 4. Pray for strength [Matthew 26:41]. 5. Our Lady says she suffers for us because of all that is coming. 6. Seek strength in the words of the Gospel and the Eucharist. 7. Our Lady says she loves us. 8. We must open our hearts to the presence of the Virgin Mary in these times. How is anything listed contrary to the teaching of the Catholic and Apostolic Faith? Why would one doubt that this is an authentic message?
I have read his stuff for years in the past but felt quite a bit ago he and Luz Maria didn't seem credible to me. Right now I am down to Manuela and Jennifer as both highly likely to be credible. Their messages are simple and beautiful. Others are like novels and/or way too political and that just doesn't sit right with me.
I have followed Pedro a while and his words always ring true...I started following him on Afterthewarning.com
Yes, I feel He was just the precursor to loosen us up and see how far things can be taken without a revolt.
Because simply not being contrary to the faith is far from the only criteria to take into consideration on a message being authentic or not.
Benedict XVI made it clear that the essential criterion to use when judging the veracity of any private revelation is "that its message contains nothing contrary to faith and morals." Here is what he said: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/...cfaith_doc_20111214_prefazione-levada_en.html “Consequently the Synod pointed to the need to ‘help the faithful to distinguish the word of God from private revelations’ whose role ‘is not to complete Christ’s definitive revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history.’ The value of private revelations is essentially different from that of the one public revelation: the latter demands faith; in it God himself speaks to us through human words and the mediation of the living community of the Church. The criterion for judging the truth of a private revelation is its orientation to Christ himself. If it leads us away from him, then it certainly does not come from the Holy Spirit, who guides us more deeply into the Gospel, and not away from it. Private revelation is an aid to this faith, and it demonstrates its credibility precisely because it refers back to the one public revelation. Ecclesiastical approval of a private revelation essentially means that its message contains nothing contrary to faith and morals; it is licit to make it public and the faithful are authorized to give to it their prudent adhesion. A private revelation can introduce new emphases, give rise to new forms of piety, or deepen older ones. It can have a certain prophetic character (cf. 1 Th 5:19-21) and can be a valuable aid for better understanding and living the Gospel at a certain time; consequently it should not be treated lightly. It is a help which is proffered, but its use is not obligatory. In any event, it must be a matter of nourishing faith, hope and love, which are for everyone the permanent path of salvation.”
Yes. Those who put this pope there knew that you need more than one pontificate - destructive though it was - to completely obliterate 2,000 years of tradition. I think the idea was to sow confusion, stack the deck with their own and yes make a mess. Sorry to say mission accomplished!
That means that any approval of private revelation must make sure that its contents have nothing contrary to the faith and morals. Not that any message not contrary to the faith and morals is inherently true. In other words, anything inherently contrary to faith and morals is automatically excluded. That criteria must be observed at the very least. I can make up a message that is doctrinally true and consistent with the faith and morals of Catholicism, yet that doesn't mean that Our Lady did say it to me.
You are distinguishing between two things: 1) the truth of the content of the message. 2) the truth about the source of the message. That's reasonable. However, I ask you, if the content of the message is true, why does it matter if the seer has misrepresented, perhaps unintentionally, the source? Why would Satan command his demons to entice a seer to promote a message that is in perfect conformity with Church teaching? If a private revelation contains nothing "contrary to faith and morals," then Benedict XVI and the prior magisterium says that it can do no harm to believe its content. You are not required to believe that it came from the source it is claimed to have come from. But you are required to acknowledge the known truth. When you make disparaging comments about a message, you can cause people to doubt the truth of the content of the message when the content is, in fact, true. Don't you think it might be better to be more clear about your specific concerns. For example, you could say "the content of the message sounds true to me, but I'm not sure that it came directly from Our Lady?" Wouldn't that be more accurate? What if it is actually a message from Our Lady? Wouldn't you feel bad if you were disparaging her actual messages to the world? Jesus spoke about a very similar situation when the Pharisees accused him of being an agent of Beelzebub in Matthew chapter 12: 24 But the Pharisees hearing it, said: This man casteth not out the devils but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils. 25 And Jesus knowing their thoughts, said to them: Every kingdom divided against itself shall be made desolate: and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand. 26 And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself: how then shall his kingdom stand? 27 And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? Therefore they shall be your judges. 28 But if I by the Spirit of God cast out devils, then is the kingdom of God come upon you. 29 Or how can any one enter into the house of the strong, and rifle his goods, unless he first bind the strong? and then he will rifle his house. 30 He that is not with me, is against me: and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth. 31 Therefore I say to you: Every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men, but the blasphemy of the Spirit shall not be forgiven. 32 And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but he that shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come. 33 Either make the tree good and its fruit good: or make the tree evil, and its fruit evil. For by the fruit the tree is known. 34 O generation of vipers, how can you speak good things, whereas you are evil? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. 35 A good man out of a good treasure bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of an evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. 36 But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment. 37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. [31] "The blasphemy of the Spirit": The sin here spoken of is that blasphemy, by which the Pharisees attributed the miracles of Christ, wrought by the Spirit of God, to Beelzebub the prince of devils. Now this kind of sin is usually accompanied with so much obstinacy, and such wilful opposing the Spirit of God, and the known truth, that men who are guilty of it, are seldom or never converted: and therefore are never forgiven, because they will not repent. Otherwise there is no sin, which God cannot or will not forgive to such as sincerely repent, and have recourse to the keys of the church. [32] "Nor in the world to come": From these words St. Augustine (De Civ. Dei, lib. 21, c. 13) and St. Gregory (Dialog., 4, c. 39) gather, that some sins may be remitted in the world to come; and, consequently, that there is a purgatory or a middle place.
I do not think he credible. I have his early messages which are almost impossible to get anymore as they've been purged from various internet sites promoting his messages. The focus of what he spoke about early on was natural disasters. Now it is focused on faltering faith and staying true to the Magisterium. Interesting that the shift happened only with Pope Francis and the rise of traditionalist criticism of Pope Francis. He never spoke of stuff that wasn't in the news or already part of internet talk. Additionally there were some very problematic early messages where things were to happen shortly and then nothing came about. I think Countdown To the Kingdom has to be aware of the issues with his early messages but, you know, people will always find some reason to support him ... especially when there is a business associated with messages.
Not sure I trust countdown to the kingdom anymore. With Fr. Rodrigue and now Giselle Cardia being exposed. She apparently used pigs blood on a statue of Our Lady claiming the statue was bleeding. And more things that the law is going after her on. Soooo . . . .they should be more careful and vet the seers better.
So let's review your concerns about Pedro Regis: 1. Early messages are hard to find because "they've been purged." Why? By whom? You don't say. 2. Early messages focused on "natural disasters." The same subject is found in all apocalyptic literature, especially the Bible. 3. Current messages shifted to focus on "faltering faith and staying true to the Magisterium." You imply that this is bad. It's not. 4. And the shift in focus happened after "Pope Francis" shows up. Hmm...I wonder why? 5. Regis spoke of stuff that was also talked about "in the news." Apparently as well as "the faith" and "the Magisterium." See #3. 6. In some early messages, Regis predicted things that did not happen. Like conditional prophecies? 7. He has some supporters, who do things for "business" reasons. Do supporters businesses invalidate the content of Pedro's messages? I know little about Pedro Regis, but I must say you are detracting him unfairly.
