Serious question: I know we’re still expecting a conditional minor chastisement, the real Fatima consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, her Triumph and an Era of peace that will last at least a generation. Yet Fr. Ripperger says here we might be on the cusp of the coming of the antichrist: https://youtube.com/shorts/hsYrhMF42ls?si=CZTuv-f9rfybL9dn Serious question - how do I reconcile these positions as they seem to be seriously at odds? I’ve always felt and believed the time of the antichrist had to come after the Era of peace?
This timeline represents my own long held belief: I feel that alternative representations among American Catholics have been influenced by the larger Protestant dispensationalist false concepts of eschatology. But Fr. Ripperger makes me question my own assumptions now.
This might be wrong, but as a lowly sinner who doesn't know the mind of God and how He decides everything, I tend to think of Revelation as a chronological book, more or less. Some people hold that the vast majority of the book of Revelations took place in ancient times with the destruction of the temple, the Roman persecution of the faithful, the triumph of the Church, with the current horrible events being the leadup to the absolute final battle of Gog and Magog. But, and this is only my lowly opinion, and I could be wrong, I feel as though we are still stuck on Revelation 6, the horsemen and the breaking of the seals. I tend to think of the Warning, which might possibly be this year, as the 6th seal that makes everyone on earth afraid and trembling. If that is indeed the case, then we will have to go through the false prophet, the beast and the mark of the beast (which does sound like the Antichrist), the persecution, and the death and rebith of the world, followed by the period of peace Mary talked about before the devil tries his last failed gambit.
The timeline of St. Louis de Montfort is nearer to Fr. Ripperger which is the 2nd Coming of Jesus Christ will happen during the era of Peace. This means the Antichrist will have to make his/its move now. The Beast System infrastructure is being built now with the rapid tokenization of all earthly assets, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink just said this in public. You can run but you can't hide.
Apparently from different apparition sites we are on Chapter 12 of the Book of the Apocalypse. The coming of the anti Christ is just before Armageddon, the Final Battle and the End of the World. There are kind of shadows of the anti Christ. Evil people forged in his image, such as Nero, Stalin Napoleon , Hitler and so on. I belief Fr Ripperger is mistaken.
The apparitions of Our Lady of Kibeho and Jesus to St. Faustina lead me to think we're much closer to Jesus' return than people think.
I have utmost respect for Fr Ripperger and he is a font of knowledge but he did say 'we might be' -- I think the 'lesser' chastisement period and the 'greater' chastisement mirror each other so there could well be some minor anti-Christ coming into the scene whereas the anti-Christ comes in the later period.
I agree. We have the words of our Lady of Good Success and at LaSalette. Also Our Lady of Revelation and Our Lady of Fatima. All promise heavenly intervention when things are at their worse. That Our Lady will restore peace. Satan will be chained. The Church will flourish. It is after this that the antichrist comes.
I think when it comes to the interpretation of these realities whether biblical or extra biblical there is a lot of confusion. This person says this etc etc. the Church teaches of a great religious deception, period of upheaval and persecution etc. Does it really matter what happens and in what order. It is like a spiral. There have been many antichrists and will continue to be. I don't think there is A neat demarcation line that would be sufficient evidence for us now. Even Christians of first century believed they were in the LITERAL last days.
Yes as it says in Scripture (St Peter) a thousands years are like a day in the eyes of the Lord. So when we hear the word , 'Soon', at apparition sites it could easily be a thousand years. True we are indeed in the End Times. But the end times will take centuries to complete. I believe this is where the confusion arises. 'Soon', to God is not, 'Soon ', to us
Ok, thanks for the sanity check. I agree with these comments completely. Others I respect also noted the equivocal nature of Fr. Ripperger’s “we might be” and I should have given more weight to that prior to letting his overall comments disquiet me. It still needs to be noted that prophecy indicates the minor chastisement will be of such an immense “biblical” nature that many devout souls will believe it is the major chastisement with all that entails.
One thing I wonder is whether there is any consensus about what exactly the great and greatest punishment of the “lesser tribulation” will be. Most Catholics who are familiar with the subject generally believe that the Three Days of Darkness will be the climax of everything. However, there have been very orthodox and well-formed Catholics who rejected the authenticity of this prophetic event, such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the late Brazilian Catholic apologist Orlando Fedeli (1933–2010).
I agree with this. But I also believe the apex of this current minor chastisement will coincide with a natural event of biblical proportions, probably a solar micronova which causes crustal displacement and the other events prophecied in the Miracle of the sun itself at Fatima and all St Pope JPII mentioned in Fulda in 1984. This is Malachi Martin’s recollection of Pope St. JPII’s remarks at Fulda, from an Antony Stine video: I was there. And they were allowed to ask him questions, directly face to face, unrehearsed. It was not a press conference, just question and answer. And they said to him, "Holy Father, have you read the secret?" and he said “Yes I have. I've read it twice." And they said, "Will you tell us what's in it?" And he said "No I won't." And they said “Is it bad? Are there chastisements?" He said, "I can't answer that because I if I answer that question it will be sensational." He said, "Supposing I was to tell you that [Florence?] would float away. And that there were going to be three days of darkness. And that one whole nation would be wiped out, completely wiped out. And that the sun would be darkened for another 5 days. And that most of the earth would be afflicted with an epidemic they couldn't cure but could live with. And supposing that all the volcanoes erupted, what would you call that?" They said "sensational." And he said, "So what's the point of telling you that?" and then they said "Well, Holy Father, are there punishments?" He said "There are punishments." And they said "Can we avert those punishments?" And he said "No you can't. It's too late." He said, "You can mitigate them". And then he took his Rosary out of his pocket and said "Say that! It's the only protection you have. Say that. Every day of your life. It's the only protection." And they said "Within what time limit?" And he said "I can't answer that." And they said "Well, why can't you publish the letter?" And he said "Because if I publish that letter," - and here's the interesting part- "It would give an edge to the Soviets that the West could not resist. There is information in it which is vital to the defense of the West."
At this stage and bear in mind we live in it who cares about the west in the grand scheme of things. the west is a horrid satanic mess. A strange turn of phrase